The Debt (2011)
  • Directed by: John Madden.
  • Written by: Matthew Vaughn, Jane Goldman, and Peter Straughan. Based on The Debt (2007).
  • Starring: Jessica Chastain, Sam Worthington, Marton Csokas, Helen Mirren, Jesper Christensen, Tom Wilkinson, Romi Aboulafia, Ciarán Hinds.
  • Rated: R.

The most effective scene in The Debt appears twice in the movie. Set to New Year’s Eve fireworks, a Mossad agent senses a disturbance with her prisoner. A chase ensues, and she shoots him with a pistol from a long distance. This scene is repeated later in the film, but there’s a twist. Pity this is the film’s only twist.

The Debt promotional posterThe Debt concerns three Mossad agents hunting a Nazi war criminal, Dieter Vogel (Jesper Christensen), the infamous Surgeon of Birkenau. The operation is headed by Stefan (Marton Csokas) and the team includes the enigmatic David (Sam Worthington) and rookie field agent Rachel (Jessica Chastain). The trio, as all fictional trios involving one female and two males must, becomes a love triangle. David is left dejected as Stefan and Rachel form a relationship, though Rachel has stronger affections for David. The trio hunts down Vogel who’s posing as a doctor in East Berlin. But their plan is too good to be true, and soon it falls apart. They’re left to fend for themselves with Vogel as hostage. A sense of claustrophobia pervades this sequence, heightened by the agents’ intense hatred of Vogel – their families were slaughtered in the Holocaust.

This story is intercut with a strand from the present, in which Rachel and Stefan are divorced and David is a recluse. Rachel and Stefan’s daughter (Romi Aboulafia) has written an account of their escapades. Here the squad is played by Helen Mirren (as Rachel), Tom Wilkinson (as Stefan), and Ciarán Hinds (as David). These older actors are more pedigreed and refined than their younger counterparts, but the younger actors have more to do. Indeed, Ciarán Hinds has only one initial scene and two or three blink-and-you-miss-it flashbacks.

This initial scene is a remarkable use of perspective and camera work. We follow Hinds and a background Mossad agent through the streets of Israel while the titles float past us. Director John Madden uses a continuous shot behind Hinds, and he sets the stage for wonderful action shots throughout the film. There’s no quickly cut artificial adrenaline here – scenes are deliberate, depending on its characters and fight choreography to quicken our pulses. Madden’s most well-known film, Shakespeare in Love, also features an all-star British cast with historical ties – but the two films couldn’t be more different.

This cast is great, but the film can’t live up to their names. The “big twist” is the film’s only twist. The Debt isn’t trying to be escapist or particularly deep – Madden makes his one theme quite transparent. The film aims to be a twisty, cerebral thriller but ends up too simple and flat to work. Better films like State of Play or Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy keep you guessing until the last minute, cycling through an endless infinite of characters and possibilities. Any spy movie worth its salt chiefly features paranoia, but there is no gray area here. The Debt spells out its ending in its first five minutes. What’s more, this finale just isn’t exciting, gathering all the tension built up from the flashback storyline and scattering it with a ridiculous “action” sequence.

As for the cast, Jessica Chastain manages to convincingly emulate Helen Mirren physically, and she provides the movie’s key performance. Marton Csokas and Sam Worthington may be underwritten, but they each have a few quietly powerful scenes. Jesper Christensen makes for a colorful villain, restrained but vicious. But Helen Mirren and Tom Wilkinson are given mere minutes to shape performances and thus less effective. In another film, I would’ve taken away entire scenes and monologues. In The Debt, I’ll remember one or two of Mirren’s facial expressions, a grave close-up of Wilkinson. In some films, this wouldn’t be the point. Names like ‘Mirren’ and ‘Wilkinson’ would take the backseat to explosives and rambunctious chases. The problem is, The Debt doesn’t seem to have much of a point. ☆☆

It’s Complicated (2009)
  • Directed by: Nancy Meyers.
  • Written by: Nancy Meyers.
  • Starring: Meryl Streep, Alec Baldwin, Steve Martin, John Krasinski, Lake Bell, Hunter Parrish, Zoe Kazan, Caitlin Fitzgerald, Mary Kay Place, Rita Wilson, Alexandra Wentworth, Peter Mackenzie.
  • Rated: R.

Though an R rated film starring our greatest living actress and two of our greatest comic actors, I am convinced It’s Complicated was churned out by the Disney Channel. It bears the same marks as what they pass as comedy: a “colorful” supporting cast, rich magazine fodder locales, and unintentionally cheesy dialogue. But while Disney provides occasional home comforts and easy entertainment for children and pre-teens, It’s Complicated is intended for the middle-aged.

It's Complicated promotional posterThe difference is in the cast. Meryl Streep is Jane, who runs her own bakery (of course), has a spacious house overlooking a beautiful nature scene (of course), and feels the need to further upgrade her house and kitchen so it will actually be her dream kitchen (of course). She’s been divorced for ten years, but is just starting to find a new normal. She even has a potential love interest, her also recently-divorced architect, Adam (Steve Martin). Then Jane’s ex, Jake (Alec Baldwin) reenters her life. He’s married an attractive nag (Lake Bell) and eagerly starts an affair. Jane isn’t so sure, but after consulting with her psychiatrist (Peter Mackenzie) she decides to ruin her ex’s wife’s life.

Jake and Jane. Don’t they just sound like a good couple? Well, they are, of course. Alec Baldwin shows off his great comic skills here, playing a mixture of himself and Jack Donaghy. The two have a great time together sneaking over to hotels or each other’s houses and awkwardly spending time together at parties. But soon others are pulled in: Adam, unwittingly falling into Jane’s madness; Jane and Jake’s three kids (Hunter Parrish, Zoe Kazan, and Caitlin Fitzgerald) who are still getting over mom and dad’s break-up; and the duo’s future son-in-law Harley (John Krasinski), who happens to see Jane and Jake in incriminating situations numerous times.

The movie’s script is tired and cheesy. Near the end, especially, Meyers seems to want to actually say something, but she drowns what little emotional heft she could’ve had in misplaced sentimentality and formulaic comic gestures. To say the film is unrealistic and manipulative is an understatement: one scene depends on your belief that Jane’s three grown children crawl into bed together waiting for their mom to come home and talk with them about the meaning of love and family. Jane has an obligatory trio of fifty-something yes-women (Mary Kay Place, Rita Wilson, and Alexandra Wentworth). Jane and Adam go on an obligatory private date in Jane’s bakery. The most that can be said for Meyers’ direction is that it’s always bright and cheerful, almost like a commercial. I wouldn’t be surprised if Meyers thought this was a commercial, though; it’s safe to bet a large number of the pots, pans, dresses, chairs, and knick knacks seen in the film were snatched up by the intended audience immediately after viewing.

What makes it watchable - if you want to give It’s Complicated an adjective like watchable - are the three stars. Meryl Streep never succumbs to the script, though she really only gets to act for the film’s last fifteen minutes. Steve Martin is pleasant and easy to watch, but Nancy Meyers doesn’t know how to use him. I don’t think they tried to make Adam remotely funny; I’m imagining consultants instructing Meyers to make him more generic and nondescript. Baldwin probably fares the best of the three, he’s able to get in a fair amount of laughs and manages to find his voice. But even this effervescent cast can’t save It’s Complicated.

The thing about It’s Complicated is that, as you’re watching it, you’re aware that it’s complete and utter tripe. The film has absolutely nothing to say about divorce, and even less to say about love. Furthermore, why doesn’t Jane choose Jake? They seem like they click together. Sure, we get that he’s a smooth operator and Adam has a superior moral character, but Jane isn’t a match for Adam. Her excuses, and the duo’s relationship, are superficial at best. ☆☆

Traffic (2000)
  • Directed by: Steven Soderbergh.
  • Written by: Stephen Gaghan. Story by Simon Moore. Based on Traffik.
  • Starring: Michael Douglas, Benicio del Toro, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Don Cheadle, Erika Christensen, Topher Grace, Luis Guzmán, Tomás Milián, Amy Irving, Dennis Quaid, Miguel Ferrer, Jacob Vargas, Steven Bauer, James Brolin, Albert Finney, Salma Hayek, Benjamin Bratt.
  • Rated: R.

Traffic is one of the most smartly cast films I’ve seen. There are stars and awards royalty here, but that’s not the point. Valentine’s Day had stars and awards royalty. Steven Soderbergh knows how to use his, to push them to the very edge with the performances that, at some points, the film becomes almost unbearable to watch. I cringed watching a teenage version of Erika Christensen, from TV’s Parenthood, fell deep into the pit of drug abuse. I was sickened by the rapier like wit with which Topher Grace delivers his lines. I was riveted and revolted by Catherine Zeta-Jones’ strength and desperation. And I marveled at the conviction with which Michael Douglas, Benicio del Toro, and Don Cheadle present us with characters of good intentions but unique morals.

Traffic promotional posterTraffic explores the drug trade from multiple perspectives: a pair of DEA agents in America (Don Cheadle and Luis Guzmán), a pair of cops in Mexico police force (Benicio del Toro and Jacob Vargas), an upper-crust woman (Catherine Zeta-Jones) who’s forced to take over the family business when her husband (Steven Bauer) goes to jail, a pair of drug-addled teens (Erika Christensen and Topher Grace), and the girl’s parents (Michael Douglas and Amy Irving). Douglas, to complicate things, is the U.S. President’s new drug czar.

The film cuts between each of these separate storylines. An orange tint is used for the Mexico storyline, in which del Toro and Vargas become entangled with a corrupt general (Tomás Milián); a blue tint is utilized for the strand involving Douglas, Christensen, and Grace; and the film is presented in normal coloration for the story of Zeta-Jones, who’s aided by her husband’s business partner (Dennis Quaid) and is monitored by DEA agents Cheadle and Guzmán. This proves to be a masterstroke. The yellow tint makes Mexico feel more intense, the blue makes drug abuse more tragic, and the normal color, in contrast, makes San Diego feel grittier.

Occasionally a character from one story will cross over into another for a brief appearance. I think, if the characters were to play the Kevin Bacon game, they would all be three or four degrees away from each other. It’s this ensemble mindset, used in similar racial drama Crash and rom-com Love Actually, that gives the film its power: each of the characters actions affects every other’s, just like in a normal drama, but it’s far more unique than a straight drama. Steven Soderbergh tried to employ the hyperlink narrative structure with his latest film, Contagion, but with less success.

The writing is sharp, the pacing smart. Soderbergh knows when to cut quickly and when to take his time developing a scene. Michael Douglas brings the right amount of helplessness and naivety to a man who’s supposed to have all the answers, while Benicio del Toro is quite effective as the simple and honest police officer. Don Cheadle and Luis Guzmán make a great pair. For me, the best performance was easily Catherine Zeta-Jones, whose arc is similar to that of Michael Corleone’s. She would never dream of becoming a drug dealer, but Michael Corleone thought he was different from his father. Desperate circumstances take us upon paths we hoped we would never set foot on.

As a teen, the movie was profoundly effective for me. My father says all teens should watch Traffic as a warning call, just like everyone should watch Saving Private Ryan to know the sacrifice soldiers go through. I think he’s right on both accounts. It was sickening to watch Erika Christensen morph into an inhuman creature. And Topher Grace was at her side the entire time, hurtling lines at the screen in near-Sorkinian style. These two teens were well-raised, logical, intelligent humans with bright futures. But drugs know no race nor class nor creed. Surely nobody I know, nobody you know, will ever get that bad? Right? ☆☆☆

Blade Runner (1982)
  • Directed by: Ridley Scott.
  • Written by: Hampton Fancher and David Peoples. Based on Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick.
  • Starring: Harrison Ford, Sean Young, Rutger Hauer, Daryl Hannah, Joanna Cassidy, Joe Turkel, William Sanderson, Edward James Olmos, Brion James, James Hong, M. Emmet Walsh.
  • Rated: R.

Blade Runner is such a visual feast that it’s easy to call it a masterpiece and forget about its flaws. Ridley Scott’s vision of the future still holds up today - in Blade Runner, the city of Los Angles is polluted, overrun by crime, and portrayed with a unique brand of glamorous cynicism. Billboards feature Coca Cola ads (don’t worry, product placement still exists in 2019) and Japanese opera singers. Chinatown is now the whole town, complete with oriental restaurants and traditionally styled umbrellas to shield L.A.’s citizens from the perennial rain. Flames shoot from factories surrounding the massive Tyrell building. All of this is overseen by what’s left of the government, as well as the Tyrell Corporation.

Blade Runner promotional posterThe Tyrell Corporation makes - or made, as they’re illegal - replicants, or machines built to mimic life in every way. They were used as a new kind of slavery, because, of course, they’re not technically alive - but as the movie shows, they live and think for themselves. Does that not make them human? The movie lets you decide that for yourself, and therein lies its power. The point is, very few in the film openly think replicants human. They are, after all, illegal, after a colony proved they were too free-thinking and murdered their owners.

Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford) is a Blade Runner assigned to hunt down and “retire” four replicants from off world. Their intents are mysterious at first, but the revelation that the replicants can only live for a maximum of four years clears their motives. They’re hunting Mr. Tyrell (Joe Turkel) for an extension on their lifespans. I don’t know how he stays in business if replicants are supposedly illegal, but it seems only some replicants are illegal.

His newest prototype is a “woman” called Rachel (Sean Young) who’s been implanted with memories to relieve her of emotions, somehow. Deckard meets this woman, realizes she’s a replicant, and doesn’t try to kill her. Of course, that may just be because he’s destined to fall in love with her, but never mind. Animals, too, are extinct on earth and have thus been replaced by replicant versions of themselves. Plot holes or a case of willing suspension of disbelief? Director Ridley Scott would probably like to leave that one ambiguous, too.

Blade Runner is a surreal experience. The dialogue and some of the acting - particularly from Daryl Hannah and William Sanderson - is strange and feels somehow disjointed, but tonally, the film is a masterpiece. Scott fuses science fiction surroundings with a film noir murkiness, and the story unfolds in the typical style of a noir detective film. The film wisely saves its action for moments of great emotion, but the ending duel seems flat and lifeless. It belongs in a lesser movie than Blade Runner.

The strangeness of the film at once makes it unique yet distant. It’s themes aren’t as focused as a more straightforward venture like later Philip K. Dick adaptation Minority Report, and scribes Hampton Fancher and David Peoples never find a middle ground between transparency and distance in conveying their themes.

I am of two minds about the performances. There’s no denying Rutger Hauer makes for a great villain, and Edward James Olmos and James Hong are effective in smaller roles. Harrison Ford and Sean Young give it their all, but in the end, they seem lifeless. Which I suppose they were supposed to be: Young isn’t human at all, and Ford is meant to blur the lines between human and machine. But this makes their performances half as memorable as they could be.

Blade Runner’s most famous mystery, of course, is whether or not Deckard himself is a replicant. There is evidence that points both ways, and screenwriter Hampton Fancher delivered the best reply possible to his thoughts on Deckard: “I like asking the question and I like it to be asked but I think it’s nonsense to answer it. That’s not interesting to me.” Like the ending of Inception or what exactly Bill Murray whispers in Scarlett Johansson’s ear in Lost in Translation, it’s better left alone. ☆☆☆

When Harry Met Sally… (1989)
  • Directed by: Rob Reiner.
  • Written by: Nora Ephron.
  • Starring: Billy Crystal, Meg Ryan, Carrie Fisher, Bruno Kirby, Steven Ford, Lisa Jane Persky, Michelle Nicastro, Harley Kozak, Estelle Reiner.
  • Rated: R.

The characters in Rob Reiner’s When Harry Met Sally… seem almost like Woody Allen characters. I know that the last sentence probably seemed extra dramatic what with the ellipses I used, but no, that’s actually a part of the film’s title. Let’s see how many times I can perplex you with my rigid devotion to film titles.

When Harry Met Sally... promotional posterWhen Harry Met Sally… finds the cynical and self-assured Harry Burns (Billy Crystal) on a road trip to New York with the opinionated Sally Albright (Meg Ryan). Harry wants to find a job and Sally’s off to journalism school. A great movie could have been made if this journey was the film’s entire narrative, but writer Nora Ephron goes a different, more realistic route. Harry tells Sally that they cannot possibly be friends because men and women can never be “just friends”, and the two go their separate ways. Director Rob Reiner gives you goosebumps in this scene: it’s understated and subtle, but still powerful.

Five years pass, and both are in happy relationships. We meet Harry and Sally only at times in their lives when they intersect, which accounts for the steady pace and narrative charm. They meet each other at an airport and still feel roughly the same animosity towards one another. Another five years pass, and their lives intersect again. They’re out of their relationships now, and decide to be friends. The two grow into the best of friends, doing everything and sharing everything with each other.

I mentioned earlier that this movie is not about their first trip together, or their first relationship together. When Harry Met Sally… spans twelve years and is nothing less than a full portrait of a couple’s relationship: the ups, the downs, the big picture, and the details. This gives the film a sense of purpose different from other romantic comedies and the ability to give us truly moving scenes and characters.

In true Annie Hall style, the cast isn’t very large. Indeed, the only other major cast members are the couple’s best friends, Marie (Carrie Fisher) and Jess (Bruno Kirby). These two provide each of them a companion and comic foil. Kirby is fine as Harry’s best friend, but Fisher strikes all the right notes as the neurotic Marie.

And this is a great comic film, no doubt. Crystal brings his usual infectious wit and energy while Meg Ryan shows a comic style and delivery similar to Julia Louis-Dreyfus at times. There are a multitude of funny lines and scenes, the most famous and enduring of which is said by director Rob Reiner’s mother at the end of the delicatessen scene.

What makes When Harry Met Sally… a good film and not a great one is not easy to pinpoint. There is no one or two detractor that keeps it from being ‘perfect’. I suppose it doesn’t have the focused script of Annie Hall or quite the comic sensibilities of other Reiner flick The Princess Bride. But it’s silly to think like that, because When Harry Met Sally… is a very good movie.

The film is interspersed with aging married couples telling stories of how they first met. The stories are alternately funny and touching, and the married couples are well-cast. Something I love in a story is when its creator shows us that this is just one of millions of similar stories, when a character picks up a book and finds out its author’s history, only to realize there are thousands of other books in his library. When Harry Met Sally… accomplishes a similar universal sense of love and relationships here. ☆☆☆